Why is the state so desperate to get us linked up to the 'net?
The race is on to get as many British people online as possible by 2012, Martha Lane Fox has told the BBC.
As the government's new Digital Champion she has been charged with getting millions online who are not yet connected to the internet.
"They've asked me to see what really clever applications of technology could help people get more employment, get more choices, take control of where they live of their own situation in a slightly more cohesive way," the co-founder of lastminute.com said.
By reading that, it would seem that the government want to fly in the face of everything they've done over the last 12 years and actually empower people. I don't buy it.
Ms Lane Fox has indicated that she wants to concentrate on the six million poorest "nonliners" first.
She will be relying on people already online to convince others to join them.
"The only way I think we can do that is if all of us as individuals sit down and think okay, how can I bring someone on this journey with me?
"Get kids training grannies, get all of us kind of plugging into our local communities to try and pull the whole country along.
We do it to help the poor.
Well, I'm sorry, but the internet, whilst being a very useful tool, is not absolutely required for everyday life. And what is this journey? Why should we all have the internet? What's in it for them? I have visions of some sort of Matrix Lite society.
I have a friend who enjoys conspiracies, and this one is a goodie, and not too far fetched. It is his belief, and with everything we've seen thus far, it is hard to argue against it, that the government is keen to introduce a national service provider akin to the Cloud system.
In a nutshell, you plug your monitor into your keyboard and your keyboard into the phone socket, absolutely everything you do on and with your computer is stored centrally. Documents you write, emails you send and recieve, websites you visit, online banking details, contacts, the lot.
Now it all makes sense. Of course with a centrally controlled system a website that the authorities don't want to be available simply isn't there. If a news site publishes a story they don't like, it simply disappears. If a blogger writes an article they find objectionable, it is taken down. The blogger would probably suffer the same fate.
The internet is a free as anything could probably ever be. The political class hate it. It must be like a maddening itch they can never reach. So great is their desire for control over every single facet of our lives that they will do anything to get control of it. So you persaude people they cannot live without the internet, you raise more taxes to put the system together (modem licence, anyone?) and then get everyone onto a system which is little more than a heavily regulated, constantly moderated intranet.
Jesus, I hate these bastards. Scary, scary shit.